You are looking at content from Sapping Attention, which was my primary blog from 2010 to 2015; I am republishing all items from there on this page, but for the foreseeable future you should be able to read them in their original form at sappingattention.blogspot.com. For current posts, see here.

What's worth knowing?

Dec 03 2010

I have my database finally running in a way that lets me quickly select data about books. So now I can start to ask questions that are more interesting than just how overall vocabulary shifted in American publishers. The question is, what sort of questions? I’ll probably start to shift to some of my dissertation stuff, about shifts in verbs modifying “attention”, but there are all sorts of things we can do now. I’m open to suggestions, but here are some random examples:

  1. How does the vocabulary used around slavery change between the 1850s and the 1890s, or the 1890s and the 1920s? Probably the discursive space widens–but in what kind of ways, and what sorts of authors use rhetoric of slavery most freely?

  2. How do various social and political words cluster by book in the progressive era? Maybe these are words that appear disproportionately often in a sentence with “reform.” Can we identify the closeness of ties between various social movements (suffragism, temperance, segregation, municipal government) based on some sort of clustering of co-mentions in books, as I did for the isms?

Questions don’t have to be historical, either: they can plug in to other American Studies areas:

  1. What different sorts of words are used to modify ‘ city ’ or ‘ crowd ’ in the novels of (say) Howells, James, and Dreiser? How does it change over time within some of them?

4. What sorts of books discuss the plays of Shakespeare between 1850 and 1922–can we identify a shift in a) the sorts of books writing about him that could confirm some Highbrow/Lowbrow stuff, or b) the particular plays that get mention or praise?

Comments:

Ben, I wanna see: 5. Can we cluster different me…

Hank - Dec 0, 2010

Ben,

I wanna see:

  1. Can we cluster different meanings of “science” in books in discrete places on the sample (1830, 1859, 1871, 1891, 1910)?

  2. Different words modifying “method” (which we already did a bit of) in different genres (sociology vs. &c.) and, for lack of a better distinction, “media” (books, but textbooks vs. general primers vs. technical works, for example).

  3. Connections between historical scholarship and keywords (any “historiography”? probably not) and other scholarly ideals (science, but also literature, archaeology/classical studies, &c.).

Some history of philosophy questions from someone …

Anthony - Dec 1, 2010

Some history of philosophy questions from someone who is not primarily a historian of philosophy:

  1. I’m curious about the influence of continental philosophers on Anglophone philosophical audiences. For example, how quickly do Anglophone philosophical writings begin citing Kant, Hegel, etc.? Does the time from publication of the original works on the continent to some threshold of mention in Anglophone philosophy decrease as time goes on? (Perhaps due to more efficient channels of translation/publication?) Can we track the fluctuating influence of particular continental philosophers and correlate them with particular developments in Anglophone philosophy?

  2. Your database should cover the early/middle years of the Utilitarian school up through its apex in Sidgwick and Moore. Care to do some analysis similar to the “capital”/“capitalism”?

  3. Assuming you can limit your search to philosophical works (a big assumption!), what are the most cited books/articles in 19th century Anglophone philosophical writings?