<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patrick O&#8217;Neil Response to Bourne&#8217;s Trans-National America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benschmidt.org/HIST1234/?feed=rss2&#038;p=468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benschmidt.org/HIST1234/?p=468</link>
	<description>HIST 1234 at Northeastern University, Fall 2014</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 04:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.18</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe.robinson93</title>
		<link>http://benschmidt.org/HIST1234/?p=468#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe.robinson93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benschmidt.org/HIST1234/?p=468#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your critique of Bourne&#039;s views on American culture.  Although our culture is heavily influenced by the Anglo-Saxon culture of our country&#039;s founders, subsequent waves of immigrants have all played a part in shaping the United States; America has developed its own identity, one which may have not been as well-defined during Bourne&#039;s time as it is today.  I also agree with the idea that even though we retain some of our cultural traditions, it does not make us any less American.  If anything, this contributes to the uniqueness of American culture.

An interesting aspect of Bourne&#039;s writing is his criticism of the South, which he contends is the most &quot;distinctly American&quot; region in the United States.  Bourne blames the stagnant development of the South on the American culture that exists there; he compares this region to Northern states such as Wisconsin and Minnesota, where the cultures of German and Scandinavian immigrants remained distinct but cooperating.  I think it&#039;s unreasonable to attribute the positive economic and social development of the North to this cooperation of cultures.  There are certainly other factors in play, but Bourne chooses to ignore them in order to support his argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your critique of Bourne&#8217;s views on American culture.  Although our culture is heavily influenced by the Anglo-Saxon culture of our country&#8217;s founders, subsequent waves of immigrants have all played a part in shaping the United States; America has developed its own identity, one which may have not been as well-defined during Bourne&#8217;s time as it is today.  I also agree with the idea that even though we retain some of our cultural traditions, it does not make us any less American.  If anything, this contributes to the uniqueness of American culture.</p>
<p>An interesting aspect of Bourne&#8217;s writing is his criticism of the South, which he contends is the most &#8220;distinctly American&#8221; region in the United States.  Bourne blames the stagnant development of the South on the American culture that exists there; he compares this region to Northern states such as Wisconsin and Minnesota, where the cultures of German and Scandinavian immigrants remained distinct but cooperating.  I think it&#8217;s unreasonable to attribute the positive economic and social development of the North to this cooperation of cultures.  There are certainly other factors in play, but Bourne chooses to ignore them in order to support his argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
